Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs Cyril Vandermeersch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Makhlouf vs Vandermeersch analysis and find out who is favored!
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs Cyril Vandermeersch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Makhlouf has won 46.97% of points on his second serve, while Vandermeersch has won 50.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Makhlouf, in recent form, has won 49.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vandermeersch has won 50.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.09% and 32.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Makhlouf has saved 52.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vandermeersch has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Makhlouf has won 62.34% of matches played (W/L 48/ 29), with Vandermeersch winning 58.62% (W/L 34/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Makhlouf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 71/ 47), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 33/ 49). Vandermeersch has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 81/ 51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Makhlouf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.34% of matches (W/L 48/ 29), where as Vandermeersch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 33/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Makhlouf winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Makhlouf winning 1 and Vandermeersch winning 2. The last match between Makhlouf and Vandermeersch was at the M15 Monastir, 02-05-2024, Second, Hard with Cyril Vandermeersch getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Makhlouf and Vandermeersch have played a deciding set 1 times, with Makhlouf winning 0 times and Vandermeersch 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Makhlouf winning 0, and Vandermeersch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Makhlouf has played against opponents with an average rank of 46.87 while Vandermeersch has played against players with an average rank of 117.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Makhlouf has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vandermeersch has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Makhlouf has converted 43.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vandermeersch has converted 41.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Makhlouf 0 - 1 Vandermeersch
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
724
Rank
670
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
52% (110-102)
Career Total W/L
57% (95-72)
61% (28-18)
YTD W/L
57% (13-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Makhlouf VS Vandermeersch H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf | Cyril Vandermeersch |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:36:0 | 2:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (58/93) | 64% (63/99) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (37/58) | 67% (42/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (16/35) | 47% (17/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (40/99) | 43% (40/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Makhlouf VS Vandermeersch H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf | Cyril Vandermeersch |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (28/18) | 57% (13/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (62/39) | 55% (30/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (514/436) | 51% (278/262) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (28/18) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 66 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 56.33 | 173.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (780/1263) | 58% (1007/1738) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (486/780) | 70% (701/1007) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (224/483) | 49% (358/731) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (57/143) | 40% (72/180) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (556/1328) | 40% (703/1755) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (28/18) | 63% (12/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (28/46) | 57% (13/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (28/26) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (28/2) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (18/2) | 18% (11/2) |
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Mohammad Alkotop
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Alexey Zakharov
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Cyril Vandermeersch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ignacio Benzal Alia
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Nicolas Colne
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Simon Beaupain
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
77%
(
91 of
118)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
3
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
59 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
118
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Michael Zhu
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Makhlouf Vs Vandermeersch Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
